After Shimon and Levi killed out the city of Shechem, Yaakov rebuked them for making the locals angry at him. Many years ago, I read an article about Israeli politics where the author was refuting Yaakov’s attitude to argue that Jews shouldn’t be fearful. He pointed out that nothing happened to Yaakov as a result of what Shimon and Levi did. The fallacy of this argument is that the Torah tells us that the יושבי הארץ didn’t run after Yaakov because Hashem put a special fear in them. In other words, Yaakov was correct in his assessment.
Bonus – Halacha Words
The Yidden don’t eat the גיד הנשה
תפילין can only be made out of kosher animals. Part of תפילין is the strings made out of animal veins. Is it permitted to use the vein called גיד הנשה? On the one hand, it is from a kosher animal, however, it itself is not kosher. This is actually a dispute among the Poskim.
After Shimon and Levi killed out the city of Shechem, Yaakov rebuked them for making the locals angry at him. Many years ago, I read an article about Israeli politics where the author was refuting Yaakov’s attitude to argue that Jews shouldn’t be fearful. He pointed out that nothing happened to Yaakov as a result of what Shimon and Levi did. The fallacy of this argument is that the Torah tells us that the יושבי הארץ didn’t run after Yaakov because Hashem put a special fear in them. In other words, Yaakov was correct in his assessment.
Bonus – Halacha Words
The Yidden don’t eat the גיד הנשה
תפילין can only be made out of kosher animals. Part of תפילין is the strings made out of animal veins. Is it permitted to use the vein called גיד הנשה? On the one hand, it is from a kosher animal, however, it itself is not kosher. This is actually a dispute among the Poskim.
If a tree is growing partially in ארץ ישראל and partially in חוץ לארץ and the trunk is in ארץ ישראל, then there is a requirement to give תרומות ומעשרות, even if the majority of the branches are outside of ארץ ישראל. Interestingly, the הלכה is different for taking ביכורים. It is not enough for the tree to be primarily in ארץ ישראל, rather, it must be completely in ארץ ישראל in order to require ביכורים. The difference would seem to be because of the word אדמתך that the תורה uses when talking about the requirement of ביכורים. “אדמתך” would seem to indicate land that is entirely yours.
The Torah introduces the laws of Pesach Sheini (Bamidbar 9:6-14) through an incident involving a group of men who, due to tumas meis, were unable to participate in the first korban Pesach given in the midbar. These men approached Moshe with a complaint, essentially arguing that it was unfair that, for reasons beyond their control, they should lose out on the opportunity to perform the korban Pesach.
The Sifrei comments that this complaint teaches us that these men wereבני אדם כשרים וחרדים על המצות – “kosher men who were serious about mitzvos”. How so?
The gemara tells us that earlier generations were criticized for utilizing halachic loopholes to avoid the obligation to give maser on their crops, but later generations were praised for not doing so. Similarly, these men who complained about their lost opportunity to perform the mitzvah of korban Pesach are also to be commended for showing the proper value for a mitzvah.
The lesson for us that we should strive to be able to do mitzvos, not to get out of them.
All learning should be a zechus for a refuah shelaimah for Yosef Ezriel Ben Chaya Michal